Write Alongside rides alongside you as you draft: decoding the RFP, catching your gaps, flagging where you drift from the funder’s rubric — with a coach that already knows your RFP one click away. The AI proposes — you decide. You stay the author.
No credit card. Draft a real section in your first session.
A recording of the real editor: as you draft, the AI raises notes — a missing required element, an unsourced claim, a vague phrase — without inventing numbers or rewriting your draft. Open a note to read its explanation and suggested fix, then talk it through with your coach. You decide what enters your proposal.
Write Alongside parses your funder's requirements and builds a scoring map before you write word one. RFP, RFA, NOFO — whatever your funder calls it.
As you draft, the AI flags unsourced claims and missing required elements — then talks you through how to close each one, in your own words, with your coach.
Your draft is scored against the funder's actual rubric — criterion by criterion, so you see exactly which points you're leaving on the table.
Drop what the funder sent you — the RFP plus every addendum, form, and attachment. It sorts out which is which, tells you what it decided, and asks which track you’re applying for. You confirm.
The real scorecard: overall score, rubric coverage, and exactly which criteria are leaving points on the table.
When a note needs more than a one-line fix, talk it through. Your coach already knows this proposal — so you skip the context-pasting that general chatbots make you do, and get straight to the work. It drafts wording only when you ask; you keep the pen.
The required elements and review criteria for the section you're drafting — already loaded.
Your rubric scorecard and exactly which criteria are leaving points on the table.
The open review notes and gap questions on your draft — and it remembers what you've set aside, so it won't re-raise it.
The AI may flag, nudge, and draft wording in conversation — but it never writes into your document unasked.
| Most AI grant tools | Write Alongside |
|---|---|
| AI writes a full draft, you edit it | You write — a coach beside you gives advice and flags what needs work |
| Generate, review, re-prompt, generate again — chatbot-style drafting | You draft, the AI works alongside — it suggests in the coach panel; you decide what goes in |
| "Trained on thousands of proposals" — sounds like everyone | Sounds like you — because you wrote it |
| When a funder asks "did AI write this?" — you have only your word | You hand them a verifiable record — AI assistance recorded as it happened |
Funders permit AI — they draw the line at authorship. NIH won’t treat work substantially developed by AI as your original ideas; NEH and Horizon Europe require you to disclose AI use; a fabricated AI citation is research misconduct everywhere. Write Alongside records a verifiable authorship trail on every plan — what you wrote, what you pasted in (recorded as such), what the AI assisted with at your request, and what you edited — and has the record independently timestamped while you write, not reconstructed after. On Pro, or a $79 proposal unlock, you can share it with funders as a verifiable link or reviewer document they can check themselves.
Won't treat work "substantially developed by AI" as your original ideas
Proposers are encouraged to indicate AI use in proposals; reviewers may not upload them to non-approved AI
Requires disclosure of AI use in funded projects
Mandates human accountability and authorship transparency
Timestamped while you write · funder-verifiable
A screen recording of the real authorship trail: the human-authorship summary shows the author wrote 11 of 15 paragraphs directly while 4 involved AI assistance — all recorded as such. Provenance and sourcing tracks uploaded documents and AI-synthesized claims still to verify; writing sessions are listed with their times; and every paragraph carries its own recorded history. The record never claims more than it knows, is timestamped while you write, and is verifiable by funders.
Write competitive proposals without a consultant budget — and stay the accountable author funders expect.
Handle more proposals without diluting quality. Every draft is defensibly your client's own work.
Navigate dense federal NOFOs and RFAs while remaining the original, accountable author NIH and NSF expect.
A consultant on a complex federal or SBIR proposal runs $5,000–$25,000. Write Alongside gives you rubric-aware, gap-catching authorship support for the proposals you write.
Free
$0
3 proposals a month — free
Pro
$129/mo
for consultants & active grant writers
Or unlock a single proposal — $79 one-time: full AI support plus a shareable authorship trail, no expiry.
Consultants: Pro keeps every client the documented author of record — and pays for itself in the first engagement.
Compare all plansFunders permit AI-assisted writing — what they require is that you stay the original, accountable author and, increasingly, that you disclose AI use. NIH won't treat work "substantially developed by AI" as your own; NEH and Horizon Europe require disclosure. Write Alongside keeps you the author — the AI proposes and checks, but nothing it suggests enters your proposal unless you write it in or ask for it — and leaves an authorship trail you can disclose. Always confirm your specific program's requirements; Write Alongside makes compliance the default rather than an afterthought.
Never. Your uploaded documents and drafts are yours. We do not use your content to train models.
No. ChatGPT doesn't know your RFP, your scoring rubric, or your uploaded evidence — and it will happily invent a statistic for your needs statement. Write Alongside is RFP-aware, rubric-tied, and requirement-checked. It's a system, not a prompt.
Draft a real, usable section in your first session — free, no credit card.
Draft your first section in ten minutes. No credit card. Your work stays yours.
Your work stays yours. We never train on it.